1. Non-commercial implementation
Article 107 (1) No. 3 - Non-commercial implementation means a business, except for the purpose of making a profit during implementation.
2. Non-obviousness
It means that there is creativity to such an extent that a person with ordinary knowledge in the technical field to which the invention belongs cannot easily implement from a known invention. It is also used as an expression of the cost-effectiveness of the invention.
3. Perspective drawing
A diagram drawn with the direction set to best represent the characteristic aspects of the invention for which a perspective application has been applied.
4. Synergistic effect
It is now rejected as the theory that either must be combined to produce a larger outcome, or that one of the components must function differently when they functioned separately in the combination.
5. Lost Points
Points lost during the conflict examination process of the US Patent Appeals and Tribunal because no priority was given to the points.
6. Success as a business
An aspect that can be considered when judging inventive steps of an invention. Different countries have different weights to be considered in judging progress.
6. Higher concept
For example, if the invention is described as a metal in the claim of the application and the cited invention is described as copper, the metal can be regarded as a higher level of copper.
7. Mutual Recognition
A system in which another country recognizes the validity of examination results and rights in one country's patent as it is in their own country. The US, Japan, and Europe is in the process of standardizing such system, and Korea and Japan also is implementing a process like this step-by-step.
*I am a student learning IP, not an IP expert. I hope it will be helpful for those who do not have the relevant knowledge or who want to learn about IP.
*The above is what I learned from a book compiled by the Korean Intellectual Property Office and Korea Invention Promotion Association (published by Mungak Park) entitled Introduction to Intellectual Property, Understanding Intellectual Property.
*The above is what I learned from a book by author Ocica O'Kim (Korean, Chinese, Japanese, and English Chinese Character Center) called Core Cases of Intellectual Property Rights.
Adpick Paid Ads
*I am a student learning IP, not an IP expert. I hope it will be helpful for those who do not have the relevant knowledge or who want to learn about IP.
*The above is what I learned from a book compiled by the Korean Intellectual Property Office and Korea Invention Promotion Association (published by Pakmungak) entitled “Introduction to Intellectual Property, Understanding Intellectual Property”
*The above is what I learned from a book by author Ocica O'Kim (Korean, Chinese, Japanese, and English Chinese Character Center) called Core Cases of Intellectual Property Rights.
댓글